BATMAN (1989)
This film is awesome. As a
life-long fan of the Caped Crusader, I have to say that if you want the
real Batman, look no further. You found him. While my favorite Bat-Flick is The Dark Knight Rises, I will explore that later. Right now, let's take a look at 1989.
There is a certain
kind of magic to Batman that no other film adaptation has been able to
successfully match. The main difference between Chris Nolan's more
recent Dark Knight trilogy, and Burton's 1989 version, is the visual
style. The main difference is a place they call Gotham City.
Tim
Burton is known for many things, but above all else, it is his bizarre
visual eye, a gift that works wonders in Batman. This film looks
incredible! Burton creates a Gotham City that the viewer can get lost
in. As opposed to Chris Nolan's outings, Tim Burton gives us a Gothic
Fantasy of the highest order. Every visual element in this film is
perfect; Gotham, the Batmobile, Joker, Batman himself, green ooze-- all
of it. Nolan had a way of probing deep into the psyche of his
characters, he seems to be a very psychological filmmaker, and he came
to with fantastic results. Nolan was obviously interested in different
aspects of the Dark Knight than what Tim Burton was drawn to. That makes
for two very good and very different films. But the 1989 version reigns
best of them all. Tim Burton gave us a work of Pop Art, a visual feast.
A masterwork of the highest caliber. Tim Burton gave us a classic.
Although his characters were not as moving as Nolan's would be, and the
plot was not as complex as later adaptations would prove the Caped
Crusader capable of, the film was pitch-perfect, ages incredibly well,
and knows what it is. A comic book movie. And what does Tim Burton do
with his comic book movie? He elevates the medium of film. Yes. I
believe Batman changed the face of film, altered the practice of
filmmaking, and raised the bar indefinitely. I have no doubt whatsoever
that Batman is one of the finest Blockbusters ever assembled, and one of
the best films of 80s American Cinema.

This movie means a lot to me, and a
lot to my childhood. The older I get, the more important this film
becomes. Something else happens too. It becomes enormous. Powerful. An
event every time I sit down to watch it. Classic Good vs. Evil, rich
design, completely unforgettable. I appreciate Nolan's films, I like all
of them quite a lot, but when Tim Burton made Batman he had something
to prove. This is the only film I can use as concrete evidence to
provide support to my claim that Tim Burton is in fact a genius. Sadly,
the amount of good films he has made are dwarfed in size by the fleet of
stinkers he has produced. But Batman is undeniably the work of a very
talented filmmaker.
I wish that Criterion could somehow get their
paws on this one. I know its impossible, but one can't help but dream.
The film is such a powerful experience, a tour de force from beginning
to end; Burton's Magnum Opus. Batman is so very important to a film
fanatic like me. This should be taught in film schools around the
country. A highly analytical dose of entertainment, the way Burton
visually tells the tale is to be admired and studied for its precise
tenacity and bold audacity. Tim Burton's Batman is a one of a kind
experience that deserves to go down in film history as a pillar of 80s
cinema.
BATMAN RETURNS (1992)
Tim Burton's first Batman picture was astonishing. I think of it as a
glimmering masterwork of the 80s. He had a lot to live up to.
Something's gotta give.
Batman Returns is not a worthy sequel to Batman, but it is still a decent flick.
Pros:
Danny
DeVito as the Penguin - Perfect casting choice. Its not the Penguin I
know from the books, but its the only Penguin I like. He is dark,
menacing, sinister, and completely 'Burton'.
Michelle Pfeiffer as
Catwoman - Once again, wonderful casting choice. Sexy, dangerous,
crazy, and seductive. Alas, completely 'Burton'.
Christopher
Walken as Max Shreck - One of my favorite ingredients in Batman Returns
has to be this character. A great and welcome addition to Batman lore,
and I wish other die hard Batman fans could warm up to him some more.
Also... completely 'Burton'.
Nostalgia - I watched this film a
lot as a child. I can't help feeling like a kid whenever I put this on.
And its a good enough film to put on once every couple of months.
Cons:
This
Is A Tim Burton Movie, Not A Batman Movie - This was supposed to be a
Batman movie. The 1989 version understood this. Don't get me wrong, a
lot of what you see in Batman is 'Burton' to the core. But in 1989 he
seemed much more inspired and much more interested in the source
material. Batman Returns is not really a Batman film. The characters you
see here are similar to their comic book origins in name only,
everything else about them had been changed, EVERYTHING. Its almost
sickening to see them take an intelligent character like Catwoman and
zap some supernatural 'Burton' nonsense into her. I like what they
decided to do with the Penguin. The Penguin is rather lackluster in the
books, but here he is truly villainous. The Production Design, although
very creative, was lousy. Gotham City from the 1989 version is a classic
movie world, whereas Gotham in Returns doesn't actually look like
anyone really lives there. This time Gotham looks like a set. It looks
like the 'Burton' standard we're still seeing today.
Batman May
Return, But That Doesn't Mean Anyone Else Will - Tim Burton's first
Batman film was populated by interesting and engaging background
players. Robert Wuhl as Knox for example, I thought Knox was absolutely
great! Nope. No Knox in Batman Returns, even though they re-wrote the
script so he could survive the first film, which seems pretty damn
stupid if you're not planning on having him return for the sequel. Billy
Dee Williams is another example of a solid background character from
the first film that was written out of the second. This doesn't just go
for background characters, mind you, Vicki Vale sat this one out as
well. Where the first film had a background full of personality and
liveliness, its sequel has dead background characters, lifeless scenery,
and a well-earned bad rep.
Really, Its Not A Batman Movie - I
love Batman. I also love Michael Keaton as Batman. And in a film called
Batman Returns, you'd think we'd probably see him a lot, right? Wrong.
Batman was demoted to a supporting character in his own feature! He is
completely underused here, and seems terribly unimportant.
Penguins - Exploding Penguin Assassins... need I say more?
But
still, all the negative things I can say about the movie aside, its
still pretty awesome, and I do like it. It is essential viewing to
anyone who enjoys the now-burgeoning Superhero genre, and to the few but
devoted 90s film fans. But I really have to recommend it to fans of Tim
Burton the most. If you like Tim Burton, you'll like this movie. If you
like Batman, you might be disappointed. But don't be too harsh on this
film. It works on an entertaining level through and through, ages
considerably well, and gives us a darker version of the Caped Crusader.
Its also NOT Batman Forever.